9.7.2 Steps in DP&M
Data
processing, validation, and management procedures for an upper-air
meteorological monitoring program would typically include the following
steps, which should be described in the
QAPP:
- Collection
and storage on-site (as appropriate) of the “raw” signals from the
upper-air sensors, followed by
real-time processing of the “raw” data by the data acquisition
system to produce reduced, averaged
profiles of the meteorological variables. The reduced data are
stored on the data acquisition system's computer, usually in one or more
ASCII files.
- Transfer
of the reduced data to a central data processing facility at regular
intervals (e.g., daily). Once the data are received at the central
facility, they should be reviewed by an experienced data technician as
soon as possible to verify the operational readiness of the upper-air
site. Backup electronic copies of the data should be prepared and
maintained on-site and off-site.
Data
collected by the remote sensing systems can usually be obtained by polling
the data system at a site from the central facility using a personal
computer, modem, and standard telecommunications
software. Other options that are available for communications with a remote
upper-air site include leased-line telephone service, local or wide area
network (LAN, WAN) connections, Internet
access, and satellite telemetry. For immediate turnaround of radiosonde
data, the upper-air operator can transfer the sounding data to the central
facility using a personal computer
equipped with a modem and communications software. There must be a bulletin
board system (BBS) operating at the central facility, or some other means
provided to receive the data (e.g., via
an Internet access). Alternatively, if a one- or two-day delay is
acceptable, the operator can mail the sounding data to the data center.
Please
note that the initial review of the data is not very time consuming, but it
is an extremely important component of a successful upper-air program. It is
at this stage that most problems
affecting data quality or data recovery will be detected. If the upper-air
data are not reviewed at regular,
frequent intervals, the risk of losing valuable information increases. If
the data are reviewed frequently, then
problems can be detected and corrected quickly, often the same
day, thereby minimizing data losses. At a minimum, the operational readiness
of an upper-air monitoring site should be checked regularly. Likewise,
maintaining backup copies of the data at
each stage of processing is extremely important. Backup copies should be
kept at the central data processing
facility and at a separate, off-site location(s) to ensure that no data are
damaged or lost.
- Additional
post-processing is performed as required (e.g., reformatting the data
using a different database format than that produced by the data
acquisition system) to produce the
version of the data that will be subjected to final quality control
validation.
- At
this stage, the data are usually said to be at “Level 0” quality
control validation, meaning that they are ready for quality control
screening and final validation.
- Quantitative
screening of the data can be performed using quality control software to
identify outliers or other observations that are possibly in error or
otherwise appear questionable.
- A
final review of the data should be performed by an experienced
meteorologist who understands the methods used to collect the data and
who is knowledgeable about the kinds of meteorological conditions
expected to be revealed in the data.
This
is the process that brings the data to what is usually referred to as
“Level 1” quality control validation, meaning that the data have been
subjected to a qualitative (and often quantitative) review by experts to
assess the accuracy, completeness, and internal consistency of the
data. At this stage, data that have been determined to be in error are
usually removed from the database, and
quality control flags are assigned to the data values to indicate their
validity. It is also at this stage that
final calibrations should be applied to the data as necessary, as well as any changes required as the result of the system
audits. Additional screening of the data based on comparisons to other
independent data sets may be performed, which is part of the process to
bring the data to “Level 2” quality control.
- Some
final processing may be necessary to convert the data to the format that
will be used to submit the information to the final data archive.
Final
documentation should be prepared that summarizes sampling strategies and
conditions; describes the results of audits and any actions taken to address
issues raised by the audits; identifies
any problems that adversely affected data quality and/or completeness; and describes the contents and formats of the
database. Typically, a copy (electronic and/or paper) of this
documentation accompanies the submittal of the data to the final data
archive. Once the above steps are
completed, the data are ready to be submitted to the upper-air archive.
Several options for creating an archive are available, ranging from a simple
repository to complex database management
systems (DBMS).
9. UPPER-AIR MONITORING
9.1 Fundamentals
9.1.1 Upper-Air Meteorological Variables
9.1.2 Radiosonde Sounding System
9.1.3 Doppler Sodar
9.1.4 Radar Wind Profiler
9.1.5 RASS
9.2 Performance Characteristics
9.2.1 Definition of Performance Specifications
9.2.2 Performance Characteristics of Radiosonde Sounding Systems
9.2.3 Performance Characteristics of Remote Sensing Systems
9.3 Monitoring Objectives and Goals
9.3.1 Data Quality Objectives
9.4 Siting and Exposure
9.5 Installation and Acceptance Testing
9.6 Quality Assurance and Quality Control
9.6.1 Calibration Methods
9.6.2 System and Performance Audits
9.6.3 Standard Operating Procedures
9.6.4 Operational Checks and Preventive Maintenance
9.6.5 Corrective Action and Reporting
9.6.6 Common Problems Encountered in Upper-Air Data Collection
9.7 Data Processing and Management (DP&M)
9.7.1 Overview of Data Products
9.7.2 Steps in DP&M
9.7.3 Data Archiving
9.8 Recommendations for Upper-Air Data Collection